Hoping that it will not be added at all, you came and sent a message through the general robot, did you think it would be added? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
You are a thoughtful person and I accept your words.
The final decision is with Telegram itself 😎
This is a great feature that might even have a positive effect on speed
Thanks to Telegram for providing this platform for users to comment. And thanks to all the users who submitted their comments here. We hope that countries that are interested in using Telegram but do not have access to it, Telegram will get an idea from these offers and help them solve this problem.
Or telegram can make an MTProxy v2 to prevent detection, MTProxy now is too easy to be blocked.
Waiting vmess and vless protocols in Telegram! v2ray is good
All those protocols are for hidden traffic, to prevent be detect and be blocked, if there have another Telegram developed protocol that can do this, it will very nice. I think using TLS as a transport layer is a good choice, it's safe, most of the traffic is TLS traffic, so putting a new protocol in it is not easy to detect. and TLS certificate is easy to get because Let's encrypt, create a TLS server is easy enough now.
Yes, you are right, if this feature is activated, people like you will stop selling filter breakers.
hi .. Please add VMess, Shadowsocks, SSR protocols to Telegram .. Thank you very much
Instead of develop a protocol by yourself which will consume money, time and energy (like what has been done for mtproto), use an open-source community-driven tools such as shadowsocks (shadowsocks-rust / shadowsocks-libev), vmess, vless, trojan-cfw, NaiveProxy, etc. Generally speaking, vmess and vless written in GO which it makes them potentially be discovered in some rare cases but right now, they are great option with great community support! On the other hand, Naiveproxy has a great advantage, its written in c++ which makes it better against DPI but it doesnt support clouflare proxy which cause it to be useless in some cases