Cryptocurrency donations for bots, groups and channels
Show a button for sending quick donations to maintainers of bots, groups or channels using cryptocurrency. This could use either an established cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, Etherium, EOS, etc. – or some…
1. not everyone gets the context that I'm replying to their message as the a message attached mostly comes before the forwarded message.
2. and more impartantly the forwarded message doesn't link to the orginial location and the linked approach not only doesn't work in all groups, but is also lengtheir and adds to the no. of steps which should just be 1, and also doesn't provide any indicator preview suggesting that the provided link is about the message as the link will have to be added to the feedback to the ans
the other point of yours being that it is not widely used is just plaing untrue or just applies to you or your friend group, as I had even many of my technologically literate friends message me many times with the forwarding message approach, but to enhance the user experience would be much better
Replying "thanks" to a public answer to a public question does not only concern two individuals, it concerns the whole group. This is called "social behavior".
Sound like an anti-social "feature" to me. Maybe I'm missing something, so I hope someone can explain this better.
yep, that's exactly what we want, requires atleast 5 click, we want to reduce it to 1...
everything doesn't hv to be shared with everyone,
being anti-social feature is okay, Tg is a messaging app, that's what it's supposed to do... being private
Let me give you an example: If some people are planning a surprise for a person and somebody asks sth about that without noticing that it's about that surprise, then you can answer him or her personally in a 1:1 chat to make clear: "don't talk to much ;-)".
Therefore you could press and hold the original message and tap on "reply privately" to preview and link that message in the 1:1 chat. (My suggestion for solving this).
My initial comment was before the OP text was changed. Original text was proposing something crazy like 1:1 private chat INSIDE a group chat, like some kind of "replies" inside a group that would be hidden for all members but only visible to the person who is replied at... Something crazy like that, lol.
Being able to reply to someone's group-message in 1:1 chat would be a good feature, I agree.