Bugs and Suggestions

Just as there are many people using channels for different functions, blogs, podcasts or more, there are many people using channels as a story function, that you do not see further is another thing, finish reading everything if you are going to write so that you understand what I am saying , Thank you.

DigiStories = Rich States = Concept of a channel = Type of content that a channel can have = Channel dedicated to States / Stories that as it has the functions of a channel, results in the rich States.

If they put states they would have a private channel base that would be hidden linked to your account but deep down it would be a channel even if you did not see it, I am not opposed to it but what I say that as in its base they would be a channel, well then We already have the states, because the states would be channels (concept of enriched states, Digistories) and since we already have that, that link is not required, as they already are, it is not necessary to do it as they say, because the DigiStories already exist without being linked to your account, they are a content type concept, they are enriched states.

If you can't see it then don't see it, "You don't like it? You don't understand. Then please leave. It's not that hard." I don't care. Good day.

Tiago Wakabayashi Jan 3, 2022

Deleted Account

The States in Telegram already exist, they are the channels, the channels are an evolution of the states and we had not realized it. MY GOD. There is auto-deletion in a day or more, you can follow only those you want, you can have a special folder to separate work or contacts (example), you can activate notifications of the channels that you want to notify you when something has happened uploaded and deactivate Those who do not want me to notify you that something has been uploaded, you can make it public or private, if it is private you can activate the "Union requests" (as if they were requests to follow it even though you do not have it added; with the Requests, accept that who want me to follow you do it), you can put text, put music, videos and more. You can also protect the content so that it cannot be saved, you can leave reactions and comment. It really is an evolution, I used to say that I did not need states but other people did and that they should put them but now that I see the possibilities, I say that channels are evolution of states and other things, with channels the possibilities are infinite, WE ALREADY HAVE THE EVOLUTION, nobody needs old states because they already exist, the new evolved states are the channels. :0

Channels is the laziest reply for stories I've seen. For a real statues features, channels aren't practical. If is to use an existing feature as statues, then we can use the profile pic/vid album. Just add an temporary option for users upload media there that will work better as statues than channels. Or add a temporary layer for profile media album, because we would have two timelines, a permanent one and a temporary one, that would work as statues.

Emilia Jan 3, 2022

I agree. In addition, we have to consider that channels are a unique feature social networking feature of telegram. However, since users are domesticated by other platforms, probably, they will need the old style stories.

Emilia

Yes.Totally, it is. It just takes imagination.

If you see this Telegram, consider that if you implement it (in the traditional way give it your own touch) that it be a channel that is created from your profile (in the profile, the first time they want to add a status, say "add channel status "and that private status channel is automatically created), that is, it is done by default and by default is linked to your profile, that is, it is housed in the profile but in is a channel (to be able to upload anything and have all the virtues that channels have but from your profile), for this, what could be done, is that apart from being able to link a group to host comments in channels, to the channels they add the option of being able to link responses to your chat to They can reply to you and open your chat directly when they want to reply to a post. Thus, you would be taking advantage of something that you already have, with the plus that they could do everything that is already possible in a channel and at the same time you would be having the states as requested in this suggestion. You only need imagination, that a channel can be accessed from the profile (that link that I explain) and you have already solved it Telegram.

Bruce Minanga Jan 6, 2022

Telegram already has the status feature in a more organised way. The channels of course. You can now access channels with new contents by just swiping up.... That's same as status right? To me it is

https://t.me/TelegramTips/292

Also as now we are chatting in groups as channels, everyone seemingly is going to have there own channels, they can post there memes there and everything and if you like them, you can follow them. Reading posts from channels has been made easier nowadays.

†

†º°˚˚° 🐾🔥ʀᴇᴜʙᴢᴋ🔥🐾°˚˚°º† Jan 6, 2022

Bruce Minanga

Uh no. We don't need another Instagram where people need to follow our channels to see what we post. Stories is a completely different concept to channels. What is wrong with you people

native spice Jan 6, 2022

I agree

xW0ll3X[+.=]x Jan 7, 2022

Status is a gently form of channel, you see a mini thumbnail. Your friend see it and he so "i'm clicking or not". The thing is, the channel is not the same. You build a channel (private mode, only for your contacts) and u must send a link or QR code to your persons .. 🙄 thats isn't gently😅 let the people decide what they want see.
greetings✋

Dr Rick% Jan 7, 2022

This suggestion comment section has been running for years 😑

Diego Marlon Jan 9, 2022

https://bugs.telegram.org/c/13367 there's a concept

Christopher J. Samuel Jan 10, 2022

Stories or, Clips is really the best, most unintrusive way of sending a broadcast message or, an update out to our Contacts. By way of a 'Stories' or 'Clips' feature, people who want to get a quick word, thought or, simply information, out to their Contacts can do this. Even better, Contacts have the option to choose whether they want to view it or, not. It's easier and less 'in your face' than sending out a broadcast message to each and every Contact. And, it's also more impermanent compared to creating a group or channel, selecting who to add, whom not to add, etc. and they sending out the message - super stressful. Also, not to forget, it would completely obliterate WhatsApp as the IM of choice for mostly everyone.I, personally, believe that the lack of this feature on Telegram Messenger is the only reason why people somehow still stuck on WhatsApp Messenger. I must say though that, if implemented, and I hope it is, it must be implemented in the sense that, only those who have been added to a persons Phonebook Contacts list can view the story, like how WhagsApp Messenger has done it. And, not just anyone and everyone.

Show next 100 comments

33322 Cards

Log In